New GAIC proposal: a wolf in sheep's clothing
Monday, 19 October 2009 07:11

New GAIC proposal: a wolf in sheep's clothing, Taxed Out Inc. media release, 19th October 2009

Landowners are still unfairly and adversely impacted by the Brumby Labor Government's Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution (GAIC) draft legislation released on Friday afternoon.

The release comes four days after the closing date for submissions to the Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee Inquiry into the Impact of the State Government's decision to change the Urban Growth Boundary, denying landowners the opportunity to submit comments regarding the new GAIC proposal.

The GAIC remains payable on the first sale or subdivision of land after it is included in the Urban Growth Boundary, based on the Government's much criticized and unproven theory that all land enjoys a substantial ‘value increase' upon inclusion in the UGB.

Taxed Out's concerns have not altered despite the fact that the tax is now payable by the purchaser. Same property transaction is being taxed, so vendors are still impacted:

 The tax is still applied at a flat rate ($80,000 or $95,000 per hectare) regardless of the sale price.

 The tax is payable on the ‘first property transaction' after inclusion in UGB, regardless of development timelines.

 The price a landowner receives when selling their property will be reduced by the amount of the tax. Certainly the tax will not be added on to the sale price as the purchaser has the obligation to pay the tax and so won't pay it twice.

 Lending institutions will only lend against a property's market value, not the value plus the GAIC liability. A loss of borrowing capacity will impact both the current vendor and the purchaser.

 In effect the GAIC tax freezes personal land assets until development is imminent (which could be decades away) but landowners will be hit with immediate council rate rises, leading to them ultimately becoming distressed sellers.

 All landowners within the new and existing growth areas are to have a notice registered on their Certificate of Title warning purchasers that they will be liable for the GAIC tax if they purchase.

 Purchasers have the option of paying the tax upfront of deferring the liability and incurring interest on the tax which is also indexed annually. The tax will therefore grow at a compounding rate the longer it is deferred.

"How can anyone on small acreage attract a purchaser with that sort of liability attached? Certainly no family wishing to live on a few hectares will take on this added liability when they can purchase property outside the UGB without this headache. That leaves only developers in the market. When you remember development in the investigation areas will not commence until 2019 even developers will not be interested in property for ten years. This will destroy the value of these homes which are predominantly held by families and the elderly," says Mr. Hocking, chairman of Taxed Out Inc.

Taxed Out maintains that the only fair and equitable trigger point for the tax is the granting of a planning permit for development.

The group also maintains that the Government's justification for charging the GAIC on the ‘first property transaction' - the theory that all land enjoys a substantial ‘value increase' upon inclusion in the UGB - is fundamentally flawed and intends to expose these issues when it appears before the OSISDC Parliamentary Inquiry at 11.30am on Thursday 22nd at Parliament House.

Taxed Out Inc. will meet with the Planning Minister Justin Madden this afternoon to address these matters directly.

Media contacts:
Michael Hocking 0400 248 099
Jeanette Laffan 0438 452 641
Nola Dunn 0421 108 007

 

Comments
Add New
Frank  - Taxed out Land Development Inc   |121.214.109.xxx |2009-10-18 11:40:37
Has anyone considered the possibility of Taxed Out Landowners forming a Co - operative Development Co ,such that we could provide Land at a far cheaper rate to first home buyers than the large corporations and at the same time realise the return for our land which
we are rightfully entitled to .

FRANK

Trevor  - Go Frank - TO Land Development Inc   |121.214.158.xxx |2009-10-19 23:55:54
Frank, I have your back on your suggestion, please make contact asap.
Roselyn  - No win situation   |121.223.104.xxx |2009-10-19 23:59:17
This obviously means that anyone purchasing any vacant property more than 1 acre will be hit with this tax when they submit application to Council to build a home. I am still in disbelief that anyone could consider imposing this tax on the "hard working" Australian after all we have battled to achieve.
Val  - Tax backflip HA HA   |59.101.183.xxx |2009-10-19 17:03:02
Mr Madden - do you really think you can pull the wool over our eyes with this latest bit of fluff - we are intelligent people and we do our research - not like you and your advisors - Please tell them to do more research and to come up with some new ideas or better still consult with Taxedout members then you may get some proper insight in to our problems and hopefully come up with something better than this latest bit of whitewash
stephen  - meeting with justin madden   |121.214.8.xxx |2009-10-19 18:01:22
well what happen at the meeting ? just the same bull shit from madden ill look into it and do nothing. Or was he saying I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOUR COMING FROM BUT MY HANDS ARE TIRED BECAUSE IM IN BED WITH THE DEVELOPERS
Jeanette  - Meeting with the Minister   |121.223.104.xxx |2009-10-20 00:17:12
Hi Stephen,

Despite the fact that we had sent several formal requests to meet with Minister Madden we actually met with his chief of staff. Not quite sure how that happened! Anyway we made it very clear to him that we are NOT happy with the changes to the GAIC and our campaign of opposition will continue. I urge all Taxed Out members to send in their comments on the draft legislation by November 2. They have given us a whole two weeks to comment. How generous!!
stephen  - Meeting with the Minister   |144.131.86.xxx |2009-10-20 18:04:21
hi Jeanette
obviously madden is shit scared of taxed out that's why he cant sit down and talk he has to bring in his chief of staff to take his place because he cant look people in the eye.
frank  - T O L Development Inc   |124.180.172.xxx |2009-10-20 23:12:57
Trevor,
Thanks for the support, But I would like to see how many others might also be interested before I arrange a meeting.
Keep your fingers crossed
Cheers
Frank
Tina  - Land Tax   |114.77.40.xxx |2009-10-27 00:38:20
I don't live in an area affected by this tax (though i have been looking for a property that's over an acre for ages). Now i am reconsidering it all due to this tax. I had found a couple of places within the UGB i was interested in until i read about this tax. I am honestly spewing.
Pete  - Greed   |58.161.43.xxx |2009-11-03 16:04:29
Cmon guys, be honest. You're upset because the obscene windfalls you were getting courtesy of the government (ie. the public) rezoning land are about to be taxed.
You'll still make a mozze out of your sales. Why don't you publish some before/after dollar values? - real ones, not extreme ones. People will then see you do extremely well out of rezoning.

Of course, if you tire of whinging, you could just simply not sell at all. The fact is, with rezoning, your land is worth alot more and should be taxed.

As for the scare campaign: 'you could be next'....grow up. This tax does not even contemplate urban landholdings. Rezone = you instantly make a fortune = you pay alot more tax please.

By the way, I don't support the taxes 'infrastructure' argument. Governments, not developers, should pay for that. I'd rather the money went to taxing the rest of us (ie. nonlandowners) less ...and that ain't landowners in rezonable areas.

Anyway, the challenge is there: put up some 'average' figures that show what you guys make through rezoning.
Jeanette   |121.222.161.xxx |2009-11-03 17:04:54
Pete, if you want to see average figures have a read of our submission to the OSISDC parliamentary inquiry. They are factual sales figures, and certainly more information than the GAA has supplied as justification for charging the GAIC upfront. We are not saying that no-one will benefit from re-zoning. Landowners close to existing development will almost certainly benefit, but those with lifestyle properties or land with long-term development potential will be severely impacted by the GAIC. The new UGB will contain at least 20 years supply of land. Twenty years is a long time to wait until your property increases in value enough to support the GAIC - particularly if you are at retirement age! We are only asking for a system that is FAIR to all - a GAIC payable when land is actually developed. I'm sure that if you are a property owner or become one in the future you would like the right to sell your property when you want or need to. This right is being stripped from GAIC-affected landowners.
myer  - greed   |60.230.35.xxx |2009-11-15 15:18:33
Who's the whinger? Maybe before you start stating your facts, you should get them correct. Until then keep your thoughts to yourself. Obviously your not affected, we are, and we know the facts and figures. Not everyone's a rich farmer as you obviously are of opinion.
Write comment
Name:
Email: *
 
Subject:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:D:):(:0:shock::confused:8):lol::x:P:oops::cry:
:evil::twisted::roll::wink::!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Anti Spam Code
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
* The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 
 


Have Your Say

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Name   :
Email    :


Your information is confidential and will not be passed on to third party.


Contact Us
South Eastern Region:
Michael Hocking
P: 0400 248 099
E:

Northern region:
Jeanette Laffan
P: 0438 452 641
E:

Western region:
Nola Dunn
P: 0421 108 007
E:



countercountercountercountercountercountercounter
Since 13 June 2009